Will it ever know the difference? It is reliable if its outcome is repeatable, even when irrelevant external factors are altered. If the scores differed by more than one point, a third, more experienced rater would settle the disagreement.
Automation has always broken down when it comes to machine-scored writing. Not that it keeps companies from trying. It is reported as three figures, each a percent of the total number of essays scored: exact agreement the two raters gave the essay the same scoreadjacent agreement the raters differed by at most one point; this includes exact agreementand extreme disagreement the raters differed by more than two points.
The first is that somebody has to pick the exemplars, so hello again, human bias. The software uses artificial intelligence to grade student essays and short written answers, freeing professors for other tasks. Agarwal said he believed that the software was nearing the capability of human grading.
Students can rapidly learn performative system gaming for an audience of software. It is fair if it does not, in effect, penalize or privilege any one class of people. Starting from this base of information, PEG can use its artificial intelligence and assess how the essay was written, automatically.
Before computers entered the picture, high-stakes essays were typically given scores by two trained human raters.