An analysis of the investigation on napoleons betrayal in the french revolution
But with the passing of time, mythology replaced the facts and everything became mixed up in the minds of the politically untutored peasants. Napoleon believed that wealth often reflected egotism and, in the absence if other qualifications.
That was the result of the isolation of the first workers' state in the world in conditions of terrible backwardness. In his biography of Stalin - a wonderfully profound work of historical materialism, Trotsky dedicates the first chapter to Stalin's childhood and upbringing - a necessary component of any biography.
He had also established institutions that embodied the Napoleon Bonaparte - Villain or Hero? He claims to represent the whole People, and speaks in its name.
He began to plan an invasion, but it came to nothing.
Did napoleon betray the french revolution essay
Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. By executing the king, the Republic had burnt its bridges. Without the Revolution, Napoleon would never have risen as he did. The power-hungry despot systematically liquidated the last remnants of the revolutionary regime and restored all the old forms: hierarchy, rank, nobility, titles, and finally even the Catholic Church. In response to the demands of the Commune, a new Assembly was elected in the autumn of , on the basis of universal male suffrage. But the British navy immediately annulled the effects of this victory. He devised a plan for an invasion of Egypt. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs However, a third opinion has emerged that suggests that Napoleon made revolutionary ideas practical and therefore acted as a bridge between the Ancien Regime and the lofty ideals of the Revolution He was lucky - but this "luck" had an objective basis. Being formerly subject to Genoa, the Corsican people did not speak French but a dialect of Italian. It was led by an oligarchy under William Pitt, an implacable foe of the Revolution.
Moreover, he had the immeasurable advantage over his rivals that he alone commanded the loyalty of the army - the peasant army that imagined that he alone was the embodiment of the Revolution that gave them the land and was now committed to spreading the ideals of the Revolution and the glory of France to every other country.
On the surface he was the faithful functionary of the Directory, but in fact he was slowly beginning to gather the reins of power into his hands.
based on 55 review